How to Play Poker Videos
Whats better fulltilt poker or pokerstars for rewards?
Pokerstars offers no rakeback just their vip reward program which is good but kinda slow and it seems it only starts paying off once you reach supernova+, on the other hand fulltilt has rakeback which seems way superior even without their very mediocre rewards program.. So what do you think?
Public Comments
- Poker star is probably easier to win money with. They have a loop hole found in their system. http://tinyurl.com/3xf8xnv
- It depends on how much you are going to play. If you are going to grind it out to get to supernova, then pokerstars is definately the better choice. Also if you get to supernova elite it is supposedly worth 100k in cash and other rewards alone, without including your poker winnings. If not, then you should go with Full Tilt and take the rakeback. Collecting the rakeback at the end of the month can turn a break even player into a fairly decent winning player.
